Background Data on the carcinogenic potential of tirzepatide from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are limited. Furthermore, no meta-analysis has included all relevant RCTs to assess the cancer risk associated with tirzepatide.
Methods RCTs involving patients receiving tirzepatide in the intervention arm and either a placebo or any active comparator in the control arm were searched through electronic databases. The primary outcome was the overall risk of any cancer, and secondary outcomes were the risks of specific types of cancer in the tirzepatide versus the control groups.
Results Thirteen RCTs with 13,761 participants were analyzed. Over 26 to 72 weeks, the tirzepatide and pooled control groups had identical risks of any cancer (risk ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 1.16; P=0.22). The two groups had comparable cancer risks in patients with and without diabetes. In subgroup analyses, the risks were also similar in the tirzepatide versus placebo, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist groups. The overall cancer risk was also comparable for different doses of tirzepatide compared to the control groups; only a 10-mg tirzepatide dose had a lower risk of any cancer than placebo. Furthermore, compared to the control groups (pooled or separately), tirzepatide did not increase the risk of any specific cancer types. Despite greater increments in serum calcitonin with 10- and 15-mg tirzepatide doses than with placebo, the included RCTs reported no cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Conclusion Tirzepatide use in RCTs over 26 to 72 weeks did not increase overall or specific cancer risk.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Dietary and pharmacological energy restriction and exercise for healthspan extension Maria Lastra Cagigas, Isabella De Ciutiis, Andrius Masedunskas, Luigi Fontana Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.2025; 36(6): 521. CrossRef
GLP-1 receptor agonists in the context of cancer: the road ahead Isabelle R. Miousse American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology.2025; 328(6): C1822. CrossRef
Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus - a current view of the different drug classes and strategies for their use Jan Brož Vnitřní lékařství.2025; 71(3): 144. CrossRef
Repurposing glucose-lowering drugs for cancer therapy Michaela Luconi, Giulia Cantini, Clara Crescioli Trends in Cancer.2025; 11(7): 691. CrossRef
Impact of 1-Year Tirzepatide Use on Glycemic and Metabolic Profile in Overweight to Obese People with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Deep Dutta, Abul Bashar Mohammad Kamrul-Hasan, Ritin Mohindra, Nishant Raizada Diabetes Technology and Obesity Medicine.2025; 1(1): 289. CrossRef
Adrenal hemangiomas are rare non-functioning tumors that originate from the retroperitoneal organs. They are generally asymptomatic, and are usually discovered at autopsy. In 1955, Johnson and Jeppensen reported the first case of a surgically removed adrenal hemangioma. We report a case of adrenal hemangioma that mimicked a pancreatic tail tumor, as detected by computed tomography. We made a diagnosis of an adrenal hemangioma from endoscopic ultrasonography and confirmed the diagnosis following a laparascopic adrenalectomy. If one is suspicious of an adrenal hemangioma, one needs to assess the lesion from every aspect. With the advancement of diagnostic techniques in arteriography, ultrasound, and computed tomography, the frequency of preoperative recognition and diagnosis is on the increase. Still, it is difficult to diagnose an adrenal hemangioma just from an imaging study. One should consider performing surgery for removal of the tumor to rule out a malignancy, and to prevent traumatic rupture. With the case presentation, we review the clinical, radiographic, and pathological features of adrenal hemangiomas.