Endocrinol Metab 2022;37:475-486
https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2022.1481
In the published article, Fig. 2C appeared incorrectly. The “r=0.65” should be changed to “r=–0.65.” And Fig. 5C also appeared incorrectly. The “r=0.59” should be changed to “r=–0.59.” In addition, Supplemental Fig. S1B and S1C appeared incorrectly. The “Before” and “After” should be switched.
The corrected figures are shown below.
We would like to apologize for any inconvenience or misunderstanding.
Fig. 2.Prominent gut microbiota at the genus level before and after bariatric surgery and correlation with body mass index (BMI). (A) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size before and after bariatric surgery (threshold 2.4). (B) Correlation between Blautia and BMI. (C) Correlation between Bacteroides and BMI. (D) Correlation between the log value of Blautia/Bacteroides and BMI.
Fig. 2.Prominent gut microbiota between severe obese patients and healthy controls and correlation with body mass index (BMI). (A) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size between severely obese patients and healthy controls (left panel). Cladogram analysis between severely obese patients and healthy controls (right panel). (B) Correlation between Blautia and BMI. (C) Correlation between Bacteroides and BMI. (D) Correlation between the log value of Blautia/Bacteroides and BMI.
Fig. 5.Prominent gut microbiota at the species level before and after bariatric surgery and correlation with body mass index (BMI). (A) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size before and after bariatric surgery (threshold 3.6). (B) Correlation between Ruminococcus gnavus and Blautia obeum wexlerae and BMI. (C) Correlation between Bacteroides dorei vulgatus, Bacteroides uniformis, Bacteroides nordii and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and BMI.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by