Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/enm-kes/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2025-05.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 100 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 101 Ultrasound Imaging Criteria and Protocols for Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: A Review of International Consensus Guidelines
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Endocrinol Metab : Endocrinology and Metabolism

clarivate
OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Endocrinol Metab > Volume 40(2); 2025 > Article
Review Article
Thyroid Ultrasound Imaging Criteria and Protocols for Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: A Review of International Consensus Guidelines
Keypoint
Given the indolent nature and favorable outcomes of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma, or PTMC, active surveillance has been adopted as an alternative management option to immediate surgery. This review introduces the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) guidelines for standardized ultrasound imaging in patients with low-risk PTMC under active surveillance, which provide practical recommendations for tumor assessment during the initiation and follow-up phases of active surveillance. This review compares the key features of the KSThR guidelines with those of major international guidelines and highlights similarities and differences in imaging methodologies and follow-up strategies.
Ji Ye Lee1,2orcid, Dong Gyu Na3orcid
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2025;40(2):185-194.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2024.2319
Published online: March 27, 2025

1Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

2Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA

3Department of Radiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea

Corresponding author: Dong Gyu Na. Department of Radiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 38 Bangdong-gil, Gangneung 25440, Korea Tel: +82-33-610-4310, Fax: +82-33-610-3490, E-mail: nndgna@gmail.com
• Received: January 21, 2025   • Revised: February 1, 2025   • Accepted: February 11, 2025

Copyright © 2025 Korean Endocrine Society

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 657 Views
  • 91 Download
prev next
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • Given the indolent nature and favorable outcomes of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), active surveillance (AS) has been adopted as an alternative management option to immediate surgery. However, the meticulous selection of patients based on individual and tumor-specific characteristics, as well as ultrasound (US) findings, is crucial in AS. Regular US monitoring is performed during AS to detect indicators of tumor progression, such as growth, the emergence of new US features suggestive of gross extrathyroidal extension, and lymph node metastasis. Thus, imaging-based evaluations play a pivotal role in guiding the decision to continue AS or proceed with surgical intervention. This review introduces the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) guideline for the standardized US imaging of patients with low-risk PTMC under AS, which provide practical recommendations for tumor assessment during the initiation and follow-up phases of AS. This review compared the key features of the KSThR guideline with those of major international guidelines and identified the similarities and differences in imaging methodologies and follow-up strategies. The primary objective of this review is to support the broader implementation of AS and improve outcomes for patients with low-risk PTMC by emphasizing imaging protocols.
  • Keywords: Active surveillance; Guideline; Thyroid cancer, papillary; Practice guideline; Ultrasound; Computed tomography
The rapid increase in the prevalence of thyroid cancer can be attributed to the increased usage of medical imaging resulting in the detection of small thyroid cancers [1,2]. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) is characterized by an indolent nature and excellent prognosis [3,4]; thus, active surveillance (AS) has emerged as an alternative to immediate surgery for the management of PTMC [5,6]. As a result, various international practice guidelines currently recommend AS as a management option for patients with low-risk thyroid cancer [7-19].
AS involves careful imaging assessment of tumors at the time of disease presentation to facilitate the selection of appropriate candidates, and watchful waiting. While most of them are anticipated to be indolent, a small number of them could behave aggressively and progress during AS. Thus, careful imaging assessment of appropriate candidates, assessment of tumor progression, and the requirement for timely decisions regarding surgery are core issues in AS [20,21].
This review introduces the practice guideline set forth by the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) for the standardized ultrasound (US) imaging of patients with low-risk PTMC under AS [22]. This guideline provides comprehensive recommendations for the US-based assessments performed during the initiation and follow-up phases of AS, including methods for evaluating tumor size, extrathyroidal extension (ETE), and lymph node (LN) metastasis. Furthermore, the KSThR guidelines were compared with key international guidelines to identify the similarities and differences in imaging methodologies, candidate selection criteria, and follow-up protocols. The primary objective of this article was to provide comprehensive insights into the KSThR and international consensus guidelines for the US evaluation under AS and optimize AS practices for the management of low-risk thyroid cancer.
According to the KSThR consensus, AS may be a suitable management strategy for adult patients with low-risk PTMC (≤10 mm, Bethesda V or VI), whereas immediate surgery is recommended for the management of high-risk PTMCs exhibiting suspicious imaging features such as potential gross ETE, LN metastasis, and distant metastasis. Current guidelines generally recommend AS for the management of PTMC ≤1 cm without aggressive cytological subtypes, potential gross ETE, LN metastasis, or distant metastasis [10,14,15,19]. Nevertheless, the indications for AS remain controversial.
Only the safest candidates were selected for AS in previous Japanese studies [6,23] however, increasing experience with AS has led to the requirement for the expansion of the AS criteria [24-27]. The recommendations of the KSThR align closely with those of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery (JAES) consensus statement [10], which also recommends commencing AS for the management of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) nodules confirmed as Bethesda V or VI with a size threshold of ≤10 mm. Notably, the French Society of Endocrinology-French Association of Endocrine Surgery-French Society of Nuclear Medicine (SFE-AFCE-SFMN) 2022 also recommends commencing AS for the management of microcarcinomas (≤10 mm) confirmed as Bethesda VI [14]. The Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM) 2022 consensus [18] and the Endocrine Task Force of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [16] also recommend commencing AS for the management of PTMC ≤10 mm, albeit without specifying the biopsy results. In contrast, the Canadian Thyroid Cancer AS Study Group has put forth a more inclusive size criterion, recommending the commencement of AS for the management of confirmed PTC nodules or suspected PTC nodules of up to 20 mm in size [20].
The necessity of performing biopsies for subcentimeter thyroid nodules without ETE or LN metastasis exhibiting suspicious US findings is a topic of debate as AS is being implemented more widely. AS was commenced following cytopathological confirmation historically [10]. However, the recommendations set forth by other guidelines vary [15-17,28]. A restrictive criterion would diminish the relevance of AS in certain settings, with similar AS outcomes being observed for biopsy-proven PTMC and nodules without biopsy confirmation [29]. The KSThR and Korean Thyroid Association recommends performing a biopsy of the most suspicious nodules regardless of the size in cases with suspected cervical LN metastases, obvious ETE to adjacent structures, confirmed distant metastases, or suspected medullary thyroid cancer. Additionally, biopsy is selectively advised for highly suspicious nodules classified as Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) 5 of >5 mm in size [19,30]. The JAES recommends performing a biopsy for nodules with US features strongly suggestive of malignancy; however, a size threshold has not been specified [10]. Notably, the SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 guidelines have adopted a more conservative stance and do not recommend performing fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for European Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System 5 nodules of ≤10 mm in size without US evidence of LN metastasis, gross ETE, or proximity to critical structures such as the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) or trachea [14]. The EORTC does not specify US biopsy criteria, as the protocols set forth by European guidelines vary [16]. Similarly, the Canadian Thyroid Cancer AS Study Group (2021) [20] and SBEM 2022 guidelines [18] have not set forth explicit recommendations for the biopsy of subcentimeter nodules.
The KSThR consensus recommends AS for the management of Bethesda type V or VI nodules detected through FNA or core needle biopsy. However, AS may also be considered for the management of nodules with highly suspicious US findings, particularly when patient preferences are considered [22]. Table 1 lists the indications for AS set forth in the guidelines and prospective studies.
The KSThR guideline outlines detailed US-based criteria for assessing the appropriateness of selecting AS for the management of PTMC. Furthermore, this guideline introduces a US-based checklist for selecting eligible candidates for AS [22]. Patients can be classified into ideal, appropriate, and inappropriate categories based on the imaging findings, reflecting the suitability of implementing AS (Fig. 1) [31]. Patients categorized as ideal candidates for AS typically present with a probable or confirmed solitary PTMC confined to the thyroid parenchyma that is not located adjacent to the thyroid capsule (Fig. 1A). Appropriate candidates possess characteristics that make follow-up observations technically challenging (Fig. 1B). Treatment remains highly effective in these patients even in the event of tumor progression. Thus, surveillance is recommended for this group. AS is not suitable for inappropriate candidates owing to the potential for significant morbidity and higher recurrence risk after delayed surgery (Fig. 1C). Thus, immediate surgery is indicated for cases with locoregional or distant metastases, potential gross ETE identified at the time of initial presentation, or the emergence of new US features inappropriate for AS.
Other international guidelines have also proposed the implementation of similar three-tiered classification systems. For instance, the SBEM 2022 [18] and SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 [14] guidelines have proposed comparable approaches, categorizing cases as ideal, appropriate (or intermediate), or inappropriate (or contraindicated). In contrast, the JAES 2021 [10], Canadian Thyroid Cancer AS Study Group (2021) [20], and EORTC 2023 [16] have proposed a simpler binary classification, which classifies cases as suitable for AS or indicated for immediate surgery.
A high-quality US examination of the thyroid and neck must be performed by an expert on thyroid imaging before commencing AS. US is the primary imaging modality used to evaluate thyroid nodules and determine the most suitable management strategy [32,33]. A thorough and high-quality US examination plays a critical role in patient selection and follow-up during AS [20-22]. US examinations must ensure comprehensive coverage of the thyroid gland and provide transverse and longitudinal grayscale and Doppler images of the thyroid and target nodules. US images of the neck compartments, including the central and lateral compartments, must be acquired in a consistent and meticulous manner [34].
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the neck also plays a supplementary role in detecting additional LN metastases in patients with low-risk PTMC [30,33]. The addition of CT to US improves the detection rate of LN metastasis in the central and lateral compartments [35-38] and may affect patient management decisions [39]. However, evidence regarding the additional value of CT in patients with PTMC under AS remains limited [40].
The lungs are the most common sites of distant metastasis in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer [17]. However, distant metastases are extremely rare in patients with low-risk PTMC [5,41-43]. Rare cases of lung metastasis have been reported; however, metastasis was absent at the time of initial diagnosis and detected only after recurrence in the neck in these cases [23]. These findings indicate that routine chest CT examinations are not necessary for identifying candidates for AS.
Extrathyroidal extension
The accurate identification of gross ETE is a crucial step [20-22]. The emergence of gross ETE under AS is considered tumor progression. The KSThR consensus categorizes tumors requiring ETE assessment as anterior and posterior subcapsular tumors (tumors abutting the thyroid capsule) and paratracheal tumors (tumors in contact with the trachea) [22]. The medial half of the posterior subcapsular tumors can be further categorized as posteromedial subcapsular tumors, whereas the lateral half can be categorized as posterolateral subcapsular tumors. Fig. 1 demonstrates the ideal, appropriate, and inappropriate US features for AS. Patients with anterior subcapsular tumors accompanied by capsular abutments, capsular disruptions, or protrusions are appropriate candidates for AS. Patients with paratracheal tumors exhibiting an acute angle abutment to the trachea and posteromedial tumors without capsular abutment, preserving thyroid parenchyma between the tumor and the tracheoesophageal groove (TEG) or the posteromedial capsule, are also appropriate candidates for AS (Fig. 1B).
Anterior subcapsular tumors with strap muscle replacement, paratracheal tumors with right- or wide-angle abutment to the trachea, and posteromedial subcapsular tumors with capsular abutment or protrusion—exhibiting loss of normal parenchyma between the tumor and the TEG or the posteromedial capsule—may demonstrate aggressive behavior or involve critical structures during AS. Thus, AS is not recommended for the management of patients with these tumors; immediate surgery should be considered in such cases (Fig. 1C).
The JAES 2021 [10] statement recommends commencing AS for the management of tumors located on the ventral thyroid or in the lateral capsule of the thyroid with US features suggestive of strap muscle involvement. However, AS is contraindicated for the management of tumors that adhere to the trachea or are located along the course of the RLN, especially in the absence of a normal thyroid rim between the tumor and RLN. In contrast, the Canadian Thyroid Cancer AS Study Group 2021 [20] also focuses on the size criteria. AS is recommended for the management of tumors confined to the thyroid parenchyma, tumors with a thyroid margin bulge without disruption, and tumors of <7 mm in size, irrespective of their relationship to the trachea. Larger tumors may be considered for AS if the angle with the trachea is acute and a normal thyroid rim is present. Immediate surgery is recommended for the management of tumors of >7 mm in size with an obtuse angle to the trachea, tumors adjacent to the RLN, and tumors exhibiting signs of extrathyroidal spread. The SBEM 2022 [18] states that AS is ideal for tumors with no ETE and appropriate for tumors with a subcapsular location, provided they are not adjacent to the RLN. In contrast, tumors with evidence of ETE, such as subcapsular tumors adjacent to the RLN or those at an obtuse angle to the trachea, are inappropriate for AS. The SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 [14] recommends AS for the management of solitary microcarcinomas positioned away from critical structures, such as the thyroid capsule, inferior laryngeal nerve, and trachea. Tumors suspected of multifocality and those located near the thyroid capsule are considered intermediate candidates for AS. The EORTC 2023 [16] aligns with several other guidelines in that it recommends commencing AS for the management of tumors without capsule contact, tumors that are not adjacent to the RLN, and those at an acute angle abutment to the trachea. Immediate surgery is recommended for the management of tumors exhibiting signs of ETE or those located in the subcapsular, posterior, or paratracheal regions, especially if they are adjacent to the RLN or invade/ make contact with the trachea. These guidelines have similar frameworks; however, they emphasize slightly different factors such as tumor size or proximity to key structures, reflecting the diversity in AS strategies for the management of PTMC.
Lymph node metastasis
Clinically apparent LN metastasis, a significant risk factor for patients with PTMC [44], must be thoroughly assessed at the time of commencing AS, as well as during AS. The 2021 K-TIRADS categorizes LNs based on US findings and FNA is recommended for suspicious metastatic LNs exhibiting any one of cortical hyperechogenicity, cystic changes, echogenic foci, and abnormal vascularity [30]. Inadequate evaluation of LNs before commencing AS can result in the requirement for extensive neck surgeries, higher morbidity, and reduced quality of life [22]. Therefore, the KSThR guideline provides detailed US-based criteria for the assessment of LN metastasis to determine the appropriateness of AS for the management of PTMC. This emphasizes that the presence of biopsy-confirmed or clinical LN metastasis, as well as distant metastasis, precludes AS and warrants immediate surgery (Fig. 1C). FNA with washout thyroglobulin measurement is recommended for any suspicious metastatic LNs, irrespective of their size.
The JAES, Canadian Thyroid Cancer AS Study Group, SBEM 2022, SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022, and EORTC 2023 recommend immediate surgery for the management of patients with clinical or macroscopic LN metastasis. However, specific imaging criteria for identifying suspicious LNs and detailed recommendations for FNA are not provided. Table 1 lists the criteria for defining high-risk tumors requiring immediate surgery in various guidelines and studies.
Tumor growth is a marker of tumor progression in AS; thus, the acquisition of accurate, consistent, and reproducible measurements of tumor size is crucial in AS [20-22]. The three-axis measurement method proposed by the American College of Radiology is recommended for the acquisition of consistent tumor size measurements [45]. Notably, the same imaging planes and slices as those used for the previous measurements must be used while performing follow-up measurements. Thus, operators must consistently measure and report nodules to facilitate serial comparisons [22].
Previous studies and guidelines typically characterize tumor progression by tumor growth, gross ETE, LN metastasis, and distant metastasis [9,10,12,18,19]. However, variations have been observed in the criteria for tumor growth and enlargement. The most commonly used standard for tumor growth, i.e., an increase of ≥3 mm in the maximal tumor diameter [9,10,24,46,47], along with the criteria of growth of ≥2 mm in two dimensions (used in a recent multicenter PTMC cohort study [47-49]), was adopted herein.
Regular scheduling of US examinations plays an essential role in monitoring tumor enlargement or LN metastasis during AS. Patient visits were scheduled every 6 months for the first 2 years in most prospective studies; these visits transitioned to annual visits thereafter [24,46,48]. Various guidelines have outlined specific intervals for US examinations based on these practices (Table 1). The KSThR guideline recommends performing US follow-up examinations every 6 months during the first 1–2 years, followed by annual follow-up examinations for ongoing monitoring based on these protocols [22]. The JAES (2021), Canadian Thyroid Cancer AS Study Group (2021), and SBEM (2022) guidelines also recommend performing US examinations every 6 months during the first 1–2 years. Transitioning to annual assessments is recommended if disease progression is not observed, reflecting a common strategy of increased vigilance during the early stages of AS. The SFE-AFCE-SFMN (2022) guidelines also recommend scheduling follow-up examinations at 6-month intervals during the first year and transitioning to annual US assessments for up to 5 years. The SFE-AFCE-SFMN (2022) guidelines recommend scheduling follow-up examinations less frequently (every 2–3 years) after 10 years, emphasizing long-term monitoring. Notably, the EORTC (2023) guidelines do not specify a follow-up protocol, leaving the details to clinical discretion. Thus, the KSThR protocol aligns with the international standards, while its explicit timelines provide clear guidance for clinicians managing AS.
Scheduling surgery for the management of PTMCs immediately after they exceed 10 mm may not be necessary, given that the progression rates of T1aN0M0 and T1bN0M0 PTCs do not differ significantly [25]. Thus, the decision to proceed with conversion to surgery must be made after careful deliberation and considered separately with respect to ‘tumor growth.’ Specific criteria for conversion to surgery during AS for PTMC, including tumor growth to 13 mm in diameter (or 12 mm in two dimensions) and the emergence of new features that render the tumor inappropriate for AS, have been outlined by the KSThR 2024 guidelines [22]. These criteria are consistent with the JAES 2021 consensus statement [10] which recommends surgery in the event of the tumor diameter reaching 13 mm or the emergence of LN metastasis. The tumor growth threshold is also set as >3 mm or a size of 13 mm, with the addition of the emergence of LN metastasis as an indication for surgery in the SBEM 2022 consensus [18]. In contrast, the Canadian Thyroid Cancer AS Study Group (2021) [20] applies more sensitive criteria for tumor growth, which recommends surgical conversion for tumors showing growth of ≥3 mm in any plane, with growth in critical locations (e.g., adjacent to the trachea or RLN) or metastasis of PTC to LNs or distant sites. The SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 guidelines [14] define the criteria for surgical conversion as the emergence of LN metastasis, signs of ETE, or confirmed volumetric increase in the tumor on two consecutive evaluations, emphasizing the consecutive observation of tumor growth, given the inter-observer variability of US size measurements and variability in tumor volume kinetics. Notably, the EORTC 2023 [16] guidelines have not set forth criteria for surgical conversion, leaving it at clinical discretion.
The current KSThR consensus statement aimed to present a comprehensive guide for imaging assessment and clarify imaging methodology, despite the challenges of operator variability and uncertainties in the prognostic implications of US in AS. This review aimed to contribute to improved patient outcomes and a wider acceptance of AS in clinical practice by aligning imaging strategies with evidence-based recommendations.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was funded by the grant from the 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Research Fund by the Korean Society of Radiology & Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology, and by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Patient- Doctor Shared Decision Marking Research Center (PDSDM), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: RS-2023-KH142322).

Fig. 1.
Imaging-based appropriateness criteria for active surveillance in thyroid cancer (≤1 cm) proposed from the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. (A) Ideal tumors: tumors confined to the thyroid gland without contact with the thyroid capsule, no metastasis. (B) Appropriate tumors. Anterior subcapsular tumors (near the yellow line) showing capsular contact (a), disruption (b), and protrusion (c). Paratracheal tumors (near the orange line) abutting the trachea with acute angle (d). Posteromedial tumors (near the red line) without capsular abutment, preserving thyroid parenchyma between the tumor and the tracheoesophageal groove or posteromedial capsule (e). Posterolateral subcapsular tumors with capsular abutment (f, g). (C) Inappropriate tumors. Anterior subcapsular tumors (near the yellow line) demonstrating strap muscle replacement (a), paratracheal tumors (near the orange line) showing right- or wide-angle abutment to trachea (b) or obvious tracheal cartilage invasion (c), posteromedial subcapsular tumors (near the red line) with loss of normal thyroid parenchyma (d, e) or protrusion (f), and posterolateral subcapsular tumors (near the blue line) with obvious protrusion (g, h), biopsy- proven metastasis (arrows). Adapted from Lee et al. [22].
enm-2024-2319f1.jpg
Table 1.
Consensus Guidelines on US Imaging Criteria and Protocols for Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer
Consensus guideline Biopsy result, tumor size US criteria for biopsy of nodules ≤10 mm US assessment for active surveillance appropriateness
 US follow-up protocol US criteria for conversion surgery
Low-risk (active surveillance) High-risk (immediate surgery)
KSThR 2024 (Korea) [22] PTC (Bethesda V or VI), K- TIRADS 5 nodules without biopsy, ≤10 mm Most suspicious nodules regardless of the nodule size in cases with suspected cervical LN metastases, obvious ETE to adjacent structures, confirmed distant metastases, or suspected medullary thyroid cancer. Ideal Appropriate Inappropriate Every 6 months for the first 1–2 years and once a year thereafter if no tumor progression is detected Growth to 13 mm (or 12 mm in two dimensions)
- Confined to the thyroid - Anterior subcapsular tumors with a capsular abutment, capsular disruption or protrusion (no replacement) - Anterior subcapsular tumors with replacement of strap muscle Appearance of new features inappropriate for AS appear
Selective for K- TIRADS 5 nodules >5 mm - No contact with the thyroid capsule and adjacent organs - Paratracheal tumors with acute angle abutment to the trachea - Posteromedial subcapsular tumors with right- or wide- angle abutment to trachea
- No suspicious feature of LN metastasis or distant metastasis - Posteromedial tumors showing preserved thyroid parenchyma between tumor and TEG - Posteromedial tumors with loss of normal parenchyma between TEG and tumor, or obvious protrusion
- Posterolateral subcapsular tumors with capsular abutment - Posterolateral subcapsular tumors with obvious protrusion
- Tumors with ill- defined margin - Presence of biopsy- proven or clinical LN metastasis or distant metastasis
JAES 2021 (Japan) [17] PTC (Bethesda V or VI), ≤10 mm Strongly suspicious for malignancy AS can be considered for tumors located on the ventral thyroid that exhibit US features suggestive of suspicious invasion into the strap muscles, as well as for posterolateral subcapsular tumors with capsule abutment or posterior protrusion. Presence of clinical LN metastasis or distant metastasis Every 6 months for 1–2 years after initiation of AS and once a year thereafter if no disease progression is detected Tumor diameter reaches 13 mm
Clinically apparent invasion into the RLN or trachea Appearance of new LN metastasis
Diagnosis of aggressive subtype of papillary thyroid carcinoma on cytology
Tumors adherent to the trachea, possibly invading (obtuse angle)
Tumors located along the course of the RLN (no normal rim of thyroid between tumor and course of RLN)
Canadian Thyroid Cancer AS Study Group, Prospective study 2021 (Canada) [21,26] PTC or suspicious for PTC, ≤20 mm Unspecified Confined to the thyroid parenchyma Known regional or distant metastatic thyroid cancer at the time of baseline evaluation At least every 6 months for 2 years, followed by yearly (if no evidence of disease progression) Growth ≥3 mm in any one plane or maximal diameter
Thyroid margin bulge without disruption of perithyroid echogenic line LN(s) suspicious for metastatic disease (require biopsy confirmation) Tumor growth in a location that is concerning (e.g., immediately adjacent to the trachea or in the course of the RLN)
<7 mm nodule irrespective of relationship to trachea Adjacent to the RLN (lacking normal thyroid rim between TEG and PTC or protrusion of nodule to TEG or posteriorly) or trachea (≥7 mm if obtuse angle to the trachea)
≥7 mm nodule if acute angle to the trachea Incident development of metastatic PTC to LNs (confirmed on cytology or unequivocal imaging)
<7 mm nodule irrespective of relationship to TEG Loss of perithyroid echogenic line at site of contact of PTC
≥7 mm nodule if thyroid rim present between the PTC and TEG Another type of thyroid cancer (e.g., poorly differentiated or other non-PTC thyroid malignancy) Incident development of distant metastatic PTC (confirmed on imaging or biopsy or surgical histology)
No suspicious cervical lymph nodes
SBEM 2022 (Brazil) [19] PTC (unspecified biopsy results), ≤10 mm Unspecified Ideal Appropriate Inappropriate Every 6 months in the first 2 years and annually thereafter if no clinical or US changes >3 mm in tumor size
- Solitary nodule - Multifocal - Aggressive cytology Growth of tumor to ≥13 mm
- Well- defined margins - Subcapsular location (not adjacent to RLN) - Subcapsular location adjacent to RLN Signs of (LN or distant) metastasis or ETE
- cN0, cM0 - Background US findings - Obtuse angles between tumor and trachea
- No ETE - cN1, cM1
- Evidence of ETE
SFE- AFCE-SFMN 2022 (France) [14] Microcarcinomas (Bethesda VI), ≤10 mm Not recommended for EU- TIRADS 5 nodules ≤10 mm, without US evidence of LN metastasis or gross ETE, distant from the RLN and trachea Ideal Intermediate Contraindicated First US 6 month after initial diagnosis, then 6 months after that, followed by annual US until the end of 5th year, then at 7 years, 10 years and then every 2–3 years Appearance of LN metastasis
- Solitary microcarcinoma located at a distance from the thyroid capsule, the inferior laryngeal nerve and trachea, without suspicious LN metastasis - Suspected multifocality - Nodule close to capsule, inferior laryngeal nerve, with signs of macroscopic ETE or LN metastasis, aggressive cytological type (tall cells, poorly differentiated...) Signs of ETE
- Proximity to the thyroid capsule Proven volumetric increase of nodule on 2 consecutive exams
EORTC 2023 (Europe) [13] PTC (unspecified biopsy results), ≤10 mm Not specified (variable according to the European guidelines) Solitary thyroid nodule Subcapsular, posterior, paratracheal location (tumors adjacent to (or invading) RLN, tumors invading or touching the trachea with an obtuse angle between the tumor and trachea) Not specified Not specified
Well- defined margins
No capsule contact (surrounded by a normal thyroid tissue rim)
Not adjacent to RLN
Tumors touching the trachea with acute angle between the tumor and trachea Extrathyroidal spread
Absence of LN metastasis Lymph node metastases

US, ultrasound; KSThR, Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; K-TIRADS, Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; LN, lymph node; ETE, extrathyroidal extension; TEG, tracheoesophageal groove; AS, active surveillance; JAES, Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery; RLN, recurrent laryngeal nerve; SBEM, Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism; SFE-AFCE-SFMN, French Society of Endocrinology-French Association of Endocrine Surgery-French Society of Nuclear Medicine; EU-TIRADS, European Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System; EORTC, Endocrine Task Force of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

  • 1. Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Welch HG. Korea’s thyroid-cancer “epidemic”: screening and overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1765–7.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Bray F, Wild CP, Plummer M, Dal Maso L. Worldwide thyroid-cancer epidemic?: the increasing impact of overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med 2016;375:614–7.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Hay ID. Management of patients with low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Pract 2007;13:521–33.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Mazzaferri EL. Management of low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer. Endocr Pract 2007;13:498–512.ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Ito Y, Uruno T, Nakano K, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, et al. An observation trial without surgical treatment in patients with papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. Thyroid 2003;13:381–7.ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Inoue H, Fukushima M, Kihara M, Higashiyama T, et al. An observational trial for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Japanese patients. World J Surg 2010;34:28–35.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 7. Takami H, Ito Y, Okamoto T, Yoshida A. Therapeutic strategy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma in Japan based on a newly established guideline managed by Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgeons and Japanese Association of Endocrine Surgeons. World J Surg 2011;35:111–21.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 8. Ito Y, Onoda N, Okamoto T. The revised clinical practice guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors by the Japan Associations of Endocrine Surgeons: core questions and recommendations for treatments of thyroid cancer. Endocr J 2020;67:669–717.ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Horiguchi K, Yoshida Y, Iwaku K, Emoto N, Kasahara T, Sato J, et al. Position paper from the Japan Thyroid Association task force on the management of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (T1aN0M0) in adults. Endocr J 2021;68:763–80.ArticlePubMed
  • 10. Sugitani I, Ito Y, Takeuchi D, Nakayama H, Masaki C, Shindo H, et al. Indications and strategy for active surveillance of adult low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: consensus statements from the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery Task Force on Management for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma. Thyroid 2021;31:183–92.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 11. Pacini F, Basolo F, Bellantone R, Boni G, Cannizzaro MA, De Palma M, et al. Italian consensus on diagnosis and treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer: joint statements of six Italian societies. J Endocrinol Invest 2018;41:849–76.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 12. Jarząb B, Dedecjus M, Slowinska-Klencka D, Lewinski A, Adamczewski Z, Anielski R, et al. Guidelines of Polish national societies diagnostics and treatment of thyroid carcinoma: 2018 update. Endokrynol Pol 2018;69:34–74.PubMed
  • 13. Filetti S, Durante C, Hartl D, Leboulleux S, Locati LD, Newbold K, et al. Thyroid cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2019;30:1856–83.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 14. Leboulleux S, Lamartina L, Lecornet Sokol E, Menegaux F, Leenhardt L, Russ G. SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 Consensus on the management of thyroid nodules: follow-up: how and how long? Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2022;83:407–14.ArticlePubMed
  • 15. Durante C, Hegedus L, Czarniecka A, Paschke R, Russ G, Schmitt F, et al. 2023 European Thyroid Association clinical practice guidelines for thyroid nodule management. Eur Thyroid J 2023;12:e230067.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 16. Koot A, Soares P, Robenshtok E, Locati LD, de la Fouchardiere C, Luster M, et al. Position paper from the Endocrine Task Force of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) on the management and shared decision making in patients with low-risk micro papillary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2023;179:98–112.ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2016;26:1–133.PubMedPMC
  • 18. Ward LS, Scheffel RS, Hoff AO, Ferraz C, Vaisman F. Treatment strategies for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma: a position statement from the Thyroid Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM). Arch Endocrinol Metab 2022;66:522–32.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 19. Park YJ, Lee EK, Song YS, Kang SH, Koo BS, Kim SW, et al. 2023 Korean Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules. Int J Thyroidol 2023;16:1–31.Article
  • 20. Ghai S, O’Brien C, Goldstein DP, Sawka AM; Canadian Thyroid Cancer Active Surveillance Study Group. Ultrasound in active surveillance for low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: imaging considerations in case selection and disease surveillance. Insights Imaging 2021;12:130.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 21. Ghai S, Goldstein DP, Sawka AM. Ultrasound imaging in active surveillance of small, low-risk papillary thyroid cancer. Korean J Radiol 2024;25:749–55.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 22. Lee JY, Lee MK, Lim HK, Lee CY, Sung JY, Yoon JH, et al. Standardized ultrasound evaluation for active surveillance of low-risk thyroid microcarcinoma in adults: 2024 Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement. Korean J Radiol 2024;25:942–58.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 23. Miyauchi A, Ito Y, Fujishima M, Miya A, Onoda N, Kihara M, et al. Long-term outcomes of active surveillance and immediate surgery for adult patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: 30-year experience. Thyroid 2023;33:817–25.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 24. Sawka AM, Ghai S, Tomlinson G, Rotstein L, Gilbert R, Gullane P, et al. A protocol for a Canadian prospective observational study of decision-making on active surveillance or surgery for low-risk papillary thyroid cancer. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020298.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 25. Sakai T, Sugitani I, Ebina A, Fukuoka O, Toda K, Mitani H, et al. Active surveillance for T1bN0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2019;29:59–63.ArticlePubMed
  • 26. Ho AS, Kim S, Zalt C, Melany ML, Chen IE, Vasquez J, et al. Expanded parameters in active surveillance for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Oncol 2022;8:1588–96.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 27. Tuttle RM, Fagin J, Minkowitz G, Wong R, Roman B, Patel S, et al. Active surveillance of papillary thyroid cancer: frequency and time course of the six most common tumor volume kinetic patterns. Thyroid 2022;32:1337–45.PubMedPMC
  • 28. Do Cao C, Haissaguerre M, Lussey-Lepoutre C, Donatini G, Raverot V, Russ G. SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 consensus on the management of thyroid nodules: initial work-up for thyroid nodules. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2022;83:380–8.ArticlePubMed
  • 29. Zhuge L, Huang Z, Cai H, Wang S, Niu L, Li Z. The optimal age threshold for stratifying the risks of disease progression in patients with highly suspicious sub-centimeter thyroid nodules. Ann Surg Oncol 2023;30:5463–9.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 30. Ha EJ, Chung SR, Na DG, Ahn HS, Chung J, Lee JY, et al. 2021 Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and imaging-based management of thyroid nodules: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology consensus statement and recommendations. Korean J Radiol 2021;22:2094–123.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 31. Brito JP, Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Tuttle RM. A clinical framework to facilitate risk stratification when considering an active surveillance alternative to immediate biopsy and surgery in papillary microcarcinoma. Thyroid 2016;26:144–9.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 32. Ha EJ, Lim HK, Yoon JH, Baek JH, Do KH, Choi M, et al. Primary imaging test and appropriate biopsy methods for thyroid nodules: guidelines by Korean Society of Radiology and National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Korean J Radiol 2018;19:623–31.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 33. Lee JY, Baek JH, Ha EJ, Sung JY, Shin JH, Kim JH, et al. 2020 Imaging guidelines for thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. Korean J Radiol 2021;22:840–60.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 34. Lee MK, Na DG, Joo L, Lee JY, Ha EJ, Kim JH, et al. Standardized imaging and reporting for thyroid ultrasound: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology consensus statement and recommendation. Korean J Radiol 2023;24:22–30.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 35. Ahn JE, Lee JH, Yi JS, Shong YK, Hong SJ, Lee DH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT and ultrasonography for evaluating metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with thyroid cancer. World J Surg 2008;32:1552–8.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 36. Kim E, Park JS, Son KR, Kim JH, Jeon SJ, Na DG. Preoperative diagnosis of cervical metastatic lymph nodes in papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography, and combined ultrasound with computed tomography. Thyroid 2008;18:411–8.ArticlePubMed
  • 37. Suh CH, Baek JH, Choi YJ, Lee JH. Performance of CT in the preoperative diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:154–61.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 38. Lee Y, Kim JH, Baek JH, Jung SL, Park SW, Kim J, et al. Value of CT added to ultrasonography for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with thyroid cancer. Head Neck 2018;40:2137–48.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 39. Jeong SY, Chung SR, Baek JH, Choi YJ, Kim S, Sung TY, et al. Impact of additional preoperative computed tomography imaging on staging, surgery, and postsurgical survival in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2023;24:1284–92.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 40. Lee DH, Kim YK, Yu HW, Choi JY, Park SY, Moon JH. Computed tomography for detecting cervical lymph node metastasis in patients who have papillary thyroid microcarcinoma with tumor characteristics appropriate for active surveillance. Thyroid 2019;29:1653–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 41. Sugitani I, Fujimoto Y. Symptomatic versus asymptomatic papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome and prognostic factors. Endocr J 1999;46:209–16.ArticlePubMed
  • 42. Choi JB, Lee WK, Lee SG, Ryu H, Lee CR, Kang SW, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma according to the presence of clinically apparent lymph node metastasis: a large retrospective analysis of 5,348 patients. Cancer Manag Res 2018;10:2883–91.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 43. Kawano S, Miyauchi A, Ito Y. Routine chest computed tomography at presentation does not identify distant metastasis in cT1aN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2020;30:1620–4.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 44. Randolph GW, Duh QY, Heller KS, LiVolsi VA, Mandel SJ, Steward DL, et al. The prognostic significance of nodal metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma can be stratified based on the size and number of metastatic lymph nodes, as well as the presence of extranodal extension. Thyroid 2012;22:1144–52.ArticlePubMed
  • 45. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14:587–95.PubMed
  • 46. Tuttle RM, Fagin JA, Minkowitz G, Wong RJ, Roman B, Patel S, et al. Natural history and tumor volume kinetics of papillary thyroid cancers during active surveillance. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;143:1015–20.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 47. Lee EK, Moon JH, Hwangbo Y, Ryu CH, Cho SW, Choi JY, et al. Progression of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma during active surveillance: interim analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study of active surveillance on papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Korea. Thyroid 2022;32:1328–36.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 48. Moon JH, Kim JH, Lee EK, Lee KE, Kong SH, Kim YK, et al. Study protocol of Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Active Surveillance on Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma (MAeSTro). Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2018;33:278–86.PubMedPMC
  • 49. Lee JY, Kim JH, Kim YK, Lee CY, Lee EK, Moon JH, et al. US predictors of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma progression at active surveillance. Radiology 2023;309:e230006.ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

    • PubReader PubReader
    • ePub LinkePub Link
    • Cite
      Cite
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Ultrasound Imaging Criteria and Protocols for Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: A Review of International Consensus Guidelines
      Endocrinol Metab. 2025;40(2):185-194.   Published online March 27, 2025
      DOI: https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2024.2319
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    • 0
    Related articles
    Ultrasound Imaging Criteria and Protocols for Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: A Review of International Consensus Guidelines
    Image
    Fig. 1. Imaging-based appropriateness criteria for active surveillance in thyroid cancer (≤1 cm) proposed from the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. (A) Ideal tumors: tumors confined to the thyroid gland without contact with the thyroid capsule, no metastasis. (B) Appropriate tumors. Anterior subcapsular tumors (near the yellow line) showing capsular contact (a), disruption (b), and protrusion (c). Paratracheal tumors (near the orange line) abutting the trachea with acute angle (d). Posteromedial tumors (near the red line) without capsular abutment, preserving thyroid parenchyma between the tumor and the tracheoesophageal groove or posteromedial capsule (e). Posterolateral subcapsular tumors with capsular abutment (f, g). (C) Inappropriate tumors. Anterior subcapsular tumors (near the yellow line) demonstrating strap muscle replacement (a), paratracheal tumors (near the orange line) showing right- or wide-angle abutment to trachea (b) or obvious tracheal cartilage invasion (c), posteromedial subcapsular tumors (near the red line) with loss of normal thyroid parenchyma (d, e) or protrusion (f), and posterolateral subcapsular tumors (near the blue line) with obvious protrusion (g, h), biopsy- proven metastasis (arrows). Adapted from Lee et al. [22].

    Fig. 1.

    Ultrasound Imaging Criteria and Protocols for Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: A Review of International Consensus Guidelines
    Consensus guideline Biopsy result, tumor size US criteria for biopsy of nodules ≤10 mm US assessment for active surveillance appropriateness
    		 US follow-up protocol US criteria for conversion surgery
    Low-risk (active surveillance) High-risk (immediate surgery)
    KSThR 2024 (Korea) [22] PTC (Bethesda V or VI), K- TIRADS 5 nodules without biopsy, ≤10 mm Most suspicious nodules regardless of the nodule size in cases with suspected cervical LN metastases, obvious ETE to adjacent structures, confirmed distant metastases, or suspected medullary thyroid cancer. Ideal Appropriate Inappropriate Every 6 months for the first 1–2 years and once a year thereafter if no tumor progression is detected Growth to 13 mm (or 12 mm in two dimensions)
    - Confined to the thyroid - Anterior subcapsular tumors with a capsular abutment, capsular disruption or protrusion (no replacement) - Anterior subcapsular tumors with replacement of strap muscle Appearance of new features inappropriate for AS appear
    Selective for K- TIRADS 5 nodules >5 mm - No contact with the thyroid capsule and adjacent organs - Paratracheal tumors with acute angle abutment to the trachea - Posteromedial subcapsular tumors with right- or wide- angle abutment to trachea
    - No suspicious feature of LN metastasis or distant metastasis - Posteromedial tumors showing preserved thyroid parenchyma between tumor and TEG - Posteromedial tumors with loss of normal parenchyma between TEG and tumor, or obvious protrusion
    - Posterolateral subcapsular tumors with capsular abutment - Posterolateral subcapsular tumors with obvious protrusion
    - Tumors with ill- defined margin - Presence of biopsy- proven or clinical LN metastasis or distant metastasis
    JAES 2021 (Japan) [17] PTC (Bethesda V or VI), ≤10 mm Strongly suspicious for malignancy AS can be considered for tumors located on the ventral thyroid that exhibit US features suggestive of suspicious invasion into the strap muscles, as well as for posterolateral subcapsular tumors with capsule abutment or posterior protrusion. Presence of clinical LN metastasis or distant metastasis Every 6 months for 1–2 years after initiation of AS and once a year thereafter if no disease progression is detected Tumor diameter reaches 13 mm
    Clinically apparent invasion into the RLN or trachea Appearance of new LN metastasis
    Diagnosis of aggressive subtype of papillary thyroid carcinoma on cytology
    Tumors adherent to the trachea, possibly invading (obtuse angle)
    Tumors located along the course of the RLN (no normal rim of thyroid between tumor and course of RLN)
    Canadian Thyroid Cancer AS Study Group, Prospective study 2021 (Canada) [21,26] PTC or suspicious for PTC, ≤20 mm Unspecified Confined to the thyroid parenchyma Known regional or distant metastatic thyroid cancer at the time of baseline evaluation At least every 6 months for 2 years, followed by yearly (if no evidence of disease progression) Growth ≥3 mm in any one plane or maximal diameter
    Thyroid margin bulge without disruption of perithyroid echogenic line LN(s) suspicious for metastatic disease (require biopsy confirmation) Tumor growth in a location that is concerning (e.g., immediately adjacent to the trachea or in the course of the RLN)
    <7 mm nodule irrespective of relationship to trachea Adjacent to the RLN (lacking normal thyroid rim between TEG and PTC or protrusion of nodule to TEG or posteriorly) or trachea (≥7 mm if obtuse angle to the trachea)
    ≥7 mm nodule if acute angle to the trachea Incident development of metastatic PTC to LNs (confirmed on cytology or unequivocal imaging)
    <7 mm nodule irrespective of relationship to TEG Loss of perithyroid echogenic line at site of contact of PTC
    ≥7 mm nodule if thyroid rim present between the PTC and TEG Another type of thyroid cancer (e.g., poorly differentiated or other non-PTC thyroid malignancy) Incident development of distant metastatic PTC (confirmed on imaging or biopsy or surgical histology)
    No suspicious cervical lymph nodes
    SBEM 2022 (Brazil) [19] PTC (unspecified biopsy results), ≤10 mm Unspecified Ideal Appropriate Inappropriate Every 6 months in the first 2 years and annually thereafter if no clinical or US changes >3 mm in tumor size
    - Solitary nodule - Multifocal - Aggressive cytology Growth of tumor to ≥13 mm
    - Well- defined margins - Subcapsular location (not adjacent to RLN) - Subcapsular location adjacent to RLN Signs of (LN or distant) metastasis or ETE
    - cN0, cM0 - Background US findings - Obtuse angles between tumor and trachea
    - No ETE - cN1, cM1
    - Evidence of ETE
    SFE- AFCE-SFMN 2022 (France) [14] Microcarcinomas (Bethesda VI), ≤10 mm Not recommended for EU- TIRADS 5 nodules ≤10 mm, without US evidence of LN metastasis or gross ETE, distant from the RLN and trachea Ideal Intermediate Contraindicated First US 6 month after initial diagnosis, then 6 months after that, followed by annual US until the end of 5th year, then at 7 years, 10 years and then every 2–3 years Appearance of LN metastasis
    - Solitary microcarcinoma located at a distance from the thyroid capsule, the inferior laryngeal nerve and trachea, without suspicious LN metastasis - Suspected multifocality - Nodule close to capsule, inferior laryngeal nerve, with signs of macroscopic ETE or LN metastasis, aggressive cytological type (tall cells, poorly differentiated...) Signs of ETE
    - Proximity to the thyroid capsule Proven volumetric increase of nodule on 2 consecutive exams
    EORTC 2023 (Europe) [13] PTC (unspecified biopsy results), ≤10 mm Not specified (variable according to the European guidelines) Solitary thyroid nodule Subcapsular, posterior, paratracheal location (tumors adjacent to (or invading) RLN, tumors invading or touching the trachea with an obtuse angle between the tumor and trachea) Not specified Not specified
    Well- defined margins
    No capsule contact (surrounded by a normal thyroid tissue rim)
    Not adjacent to RLN
    Tumors touching the trachea with acute angle between the tumor and trachea Extrathyroidal spread
    Absence of LN metastasis Lymph node metastases
    Table 1. Consensus Guidelines on US Imaging Criteria and Protocols for Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer

    US, ultrasound; KSThR, Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; K-TIRADS, Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; LN, lymph node; ETE, extrathyroidal extension; TEG, tracheoesophageal groove; AS, active surveillance; JAES, Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery; RLN, recurrent laryngeal nerve; SBEM, Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism; SFE-AFCE-SFMN, French Society of Endocrinology-French Association of Endocrine Surgery-French Society of Nuclear Medicine; EU-TIRADS, European Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System; EORTC, Endocrine Task Force of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

    Table 1.

    Endocrinol Metab : Endocrinology and Metabolism
    © Korean Endocrine Society.
    TOP