Plasma C-Peptide Level and Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Coefficient of Variation as a Predictable Risk Factor for Hypoglycemia in Koreans with Diabetes

Seung-Hyun Ko

doi:10.3803/EnM.2025.2403

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Endocrinol Metab > Volume 40(2); 2025 > Article

Editorial Diabetes, obesity and metabolism Plasma C-Peptide Level and Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Coefficient of Variation as a Predictable Risk Factor for Hypoglycemia in Koreans with Diabetes: Seung-Hyun Ko; Endocrinology and Metabolism 2025;40(2):198-200.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2025.2403
Published online: April 24, 2025

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea

Corresponding author: Seung-Hyun Ko. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 93 Jungbu-daero, Paldal-gu, Suwon 16247, Korea Tel: +82-31-249-8059, Fax: +82-31-249-8155, E-mail: kosh@catholic.ac.kr

• Received: April 6, 2025 • Accepted: April 7, 2025

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

255 Views
12 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Article information
References

See the Original "Plasma C-Peptide Levels and the Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Defined Coefficient of Variation in Risk Prediction for Hypoglycemia in Korean People with Diabetes Having Normal and Impaired Kidney Function" on page 268.

Hypoglycemia is one of the major limiting factors in intensive glycemic control, which is essential for preventing long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) [1]. In addition to causing uncomfortable symptoms and fostering hypoglycemic fear, hypoglycemia is associated with several abnormalities that contribute to vascular risk, including arrhythmias, endothelial cell dysfunction, increased inflammation, and a prothrombotic environment [2]. If left untreated, hypoglycemia may progress to severe hypoglycemia (SH), defined as a hypoglycemic event that requires assistance from another person for recovery and leads to acute, severe cognitive impairment [3]. In 2019, the prevalence of SH events was 0.6%, with an incidence rate of 4.43 per 1,000 person-years, and approximately 23,000 SH events occur each year in Korea [4]. The relationship between SH and cardiovascular disease outcomes or mortality is supported by many large randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, and meta-analyses [5,6]. Therefore, early detection of high-risk patients and individualized education for hypoglycemia prevention are very important.

Assessing an individual’s risk for hypoglycemia involves evaluating both clinical risk factors and relevant socioeconomic factors. Well-known clinical and biological risk factors for hypoglycemic events include older age, multimorbidity, cognitive dysfunction, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, depression, neuropathy, and recurrent hypoglycemia [7,8]. Recently, with the increased use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) among individuals with DM, the episodes and duration of hypoglycemia have become more clinically apparent and easily measurable using the CGM-derived time below range (TBR) parameter [8]. This enables earlier intervention to facilitate behavioral and therapeutic changes that help avoid future episodes of hypoglycemia and SH. Therefore, CGM is recommended for insulin-treated individuals with DM, especially those using multiple daily insulin injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [9].

Although CGM reveals more instances of hypoglycemia, many of these episodes go unrecognized by individuals with type 1 DM (T1DM) and insulin-treated type 2 DM (T2DM). According to findings from the Hypoglycaemia-Measurement, Thresholds and Impacts (Hypo-METRICS) study, nearly two-thirds of CGM-detected hypoglycemic episodes were not recognized by patients, and over 40% of reported symptomatic events occurred at levels exceeding 70 mg/dL [10]. Moreover, for CGM-detected hypoglycemia below 54 mg/dL, 55% of episodes in individuals with T1DM and 71% in those with T2DM were not accompanied by patient-reported symptoms [10]. These findings suggest that additional predictive markers in conjunction with CGM are necessary for the early detection of individuals at high risk for hypoglycemia in DM.

In general, increased glycemic variability is associated with a higher risk of hypoglycemia and SH. The percent coefficient of variation (%CV), which is calculated by dividing the standard deviation of glucose levels by the mean glucose level, is one indicator of glycemic variability measured by CGM. A %CV of 36% or greater corresponds to a relatively unstable glucose profile [11-13]. A post hoc analysis of the Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Glycemic Control Including Hypoglycemia and Quality of Life of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (ISCHIA) study, which investigated the association of %CV with clinical characteristics and CGM metrics, identified a discrimination threshold of approximately 40% to 42% for the risk of SH [14].

Recently, Kwon et al. [15] reported data from a large Korean cohort, comprising 1,185 adults with T1DM (n=196, 16.5%) and T2DM, who underwent professional CGM in an outpatient setting, to explore the predictive values of plasma C-peptide levels in comparison with the well-established predictor, CGM-defined CV, for hypoglycemia risk. The study conducted a receiver operating characteristic analysis of random C-peptide levels and CGM-defined CV for predicting a TBR (<70 mg/dL) greater than 4%. The optimal cut-off value for CGM-defined CV in T1DM was 36.0% (sensitivity, 87.0%; specificity, 72.5%; area under the curve [AUC], 0.89 [0.83–0.94]; P<0.001), and in T2DM, it was 30.6% (sensitivity, 87.0%; specificity, 72.5%; AUC, 0.82 [0.79–0.94]; P<0.001) [15]. In a subgroup analysis of participants with T1DM, the study confirmed that random C-peptide levels retained predictive value for a TBR (<54 mg/dL) greater than 1%. The optimal cut-off value for predicting a TBR (<54 mg/dL) greater than 1% in this group was 0.2 ng/mL, which was significantly lower than the corresponding value observed in participants with T2DM. Additionally, as CKD progressed, the researchers observed a negative correlation between plasma C-peptide levels and CGM-assessed CV, accompanied by a diminished predictive ability of plasma C-peptide levels for hypoglycemia. In contrast, the CGM-defined CV remained a reliable predictor of hypoglycemia across all stages of kidney function [15].

Indeed, hypoglycemia and glycemic variability—factors that HbA1c fails to capture—have been associated with adverse clinical outcomes in individuals with DM [16]. Current research demonstrates that combining various clinical factors yields a more accurate risk assessment than relying on a single parameter. CGM metrics such as TBR alone do not appear sufficiently accurate for predicting future episodes of hypoglycemia or SH. Therefore, it is recommended to combine TBR with other clinical measures—such as C-peptide levels in specific subgroups, traditional questionnaires for hypoglycemia detection, the updated Hypo A-Q awareness scale, or the %CV—in the absence of a singularly perfect measure [17,18].

Article information

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Seung-Hyun Ko is an executive editor of the journal. But she was not involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process of this article. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References

1. Davis SN, Duckworth W, Emanuele N, Hayward RA, Wiitala WL, Thottapurathu L, et al. Effects of severe hypoglycemia on cardiovascular outcomes and death in the veterans affairs diabetes trial. Diabetes Care 2019;42:157–63.Article PubMed PMC PDF
2. Chow E, Bernjak A, Williams S, Fawdry RA, Hibbert S, Freeman J, et al. Risk of cardiac arrhythmias during hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk. Diabetes 2014;63:1738–47.Article PubMed PDF
3. International Hypoglycaemia Study Group. Glucose concentrations of less than 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) should be reported in clinical trials: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2017;40:155–7.Article PubMed PDF
4. Yun JS, Han K, Ko SH. Trends of severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes in Korea: a longitudinal nationwide cohort study. J Diabetes Investig 2022;13:1438–43.Article PubMed PMC PDF
5. Yun JS, Park YM, Han K, Cha SA, Ahn YB, Ko SH. Severe hypoglycemia and the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in type 2 diabetes: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2019;18:103.Article PubMed PMC PDF
6. Goto A, Arah OA, Goto M, Terauchi Y, Noda M. Severe hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis with bias analysis. BMJ 2013;347:f4533.Article PubMed
7. Silbert R, Salcido-Montenegro A, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Katabi A, McCoy RG. Hypoglycemia among patients with type 2 diabetes: epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention strategies. Curr Diab Rep 2018;18:53.Article PubMed PMC PDF
8. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 6. Glycemic goals and hypoglycemia: standards of care in diabetes-2025. Diabetes Care 2025;48(Supplement 1):S128–45.Article PubMed PDF
9. Choi JH, Lee KA, Moon JH, Chon S, Kim DJ, Kim HJ, et al. 2023 Clinical practice guidelines for diabetes mellitus of the Korean Diabetes Association. Diabetes Metab J 2023;47:575–94.PubMed PMC
10. Divilly P, Martine-Edith G, Zaremba N, Soholm U, Mahmoudi Z, Cigler M, et al. Relationship between sensor-detected hypoglycemia and patient-reported hypoglycemia in people with type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: the Hypo-METRICS Study. Diabetes Care 2024;47:1769–77.Article PubMed PMC PDF
11. Monnier L, Colette C, Wojtusciszyn A, Dejager S, Renard E, Molinari N, et al. Toward defining the threshold between low and high glucose variability in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2017;40:832–8.Article PubMed PDF
12. Yoo JH, Yang SH, Jin SM, Kim JH. Optimal coefficient of variance threshold to minimize hypoglycemia risk in individuals with well-controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab J 2024;48:429–39.Article PubMed PMC PDF
13. Ajjan RA. The clinical importance of measuring glycaemic variability: utilising new metrics to optimise glycaemic control. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024;26 Suppl 7:3–16.Article PubMed PMC
14. Murata T, Matsuhisa M, Kuroda A, Toyoda M, Hirota Y, Ogura M, et al. The relationship between the percent coefficient of variation of sensor glucose levels and the risk of severe hypoglycemia or non-severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: post hoc analysis of the ISCHIA study. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2025 Feb 17 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251318756.Article
15. Kwon SY, Park J, Park SH, Lee YB, Kim G, Hur KY, et al. Plasma C-peptide levels and the continuous glucose monitoring-defined coefficient of variation in risk prediction for hypoglycemia in Korean people with diabetes having normal and impaired kidney function. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2025;40:268–77.Article PubMed PMC PDF
16. Zinman B, Marso SP, Christiansen E, Calanna S, Rasmussen S, Buse JB, et al. Hypoglycemia, cardiovascular outcomes, and death: the LEADER experience. Diabetes Care 2018;41:1783–91.Article PubMed PDF
17. Henao-Carrillo DC, Sierra-Matamoros FA, Carrillo Algarra AJ, Garcia-Lugo JP, Hernandez-Zambrano SM. Validation of the hypoglycemia awareness questionnaire to assess hypoglycemia awareness in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2023;17:102917.Article PubMed
18. Berry SA, Liarakos AL, Koutroukas V, Choudhary P, Wilmot EG, Iqbal A. The challenge of assessing impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia in diabetes in the era of continuous glucose monitoring: a narrative review of evidence and translation into clinical practice. Diabetes Obes Metab 2025;27:2363–76.PubMed PMC

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

Cite: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Plasma C-Peptide Level and Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Coefficient of Variation as a Predictable Risk Factor for Hypoglycemia in Koreans with Diabetes

Endocrinol Metab. 2025;40(2):198-200. Published online April 24, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2025.2403

XML Download

Related articles

Plasma C-Peptide Levels and the Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Defined Coefficient of Variation in Risk Prediction for Hypoglycemia in Korean People with Diabetes Having Normal and Impaired Kidney Function

Plasma C-Peptide Level and Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Coefficient of Variation as a Predictable Risk Factor for Hypoglycemia in Koreans with Diabetes