Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Endocrinol Metab : Endocrinology and Metabolism

clarivate
OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Endocrinol Metab > Volume 40(4); 2025 > Article
Editorial
Thyroid Thyroid Cancer Risk and the Next Generation of Diabetes Drugs: What Can We Learn from Incretin-Based Therapies?
Heejun Son1orcid, Sun Wook Cho1,2orcid
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2025;40(4):539-541.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2025.2581
Published online: August 26, 2025

1Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

2Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding author: Sun Wook Cho. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea Tel: +82-2-2072-4761, Fax: +82-2-2072-7246, E-mail: swchomd@snu.ac.kr
• Received: July 30, 2025   • Accepted: August 5, 2025

Copyright © 2025 Korean Endocrine Society

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 2,423 Views
  • 63 Download
prev next
Incretin-based therapies, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, have transformed the management of type 2 diabetes. While their benefits for glycemic control are well established, early preclinical studies raised concerns about potential safety issues related to thyroid malignancies, particularly medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), highlighting the need for comprehensive epidemiological evaluation. These safety considerations extend beyond immediate clinical practice, carrying significant implications for the ongoing development and use of next-generation incretin-based therapeutic agents.
Recently, Bea et al. [1] conducted a comprehensive cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Database, encompassing 21,722 GLP-1RA users and 904,300 DPP-4 inhibitor users, with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors serving as the reference comparator group. Their findings indicated that neither GLP-1RAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.53) nor DPP-4 inhibitors (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.14) were associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer compared to SGLT2 inhibitors. These results were robust across multiple analytical approaches, including subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and specific assessments of MTC cases, thereby strengthening the validity of their conclusions.
These findings align with converging evidence from large-scale international studies across diverse healthcare systems (Table 1). The multinational investigation by Pasternak et al. [2], utilizing data from six countries, found no increased risk of thyroid cancer with GLP-1RA use (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.12) among 98,147 GLP-1RA users and 2,488,303 DPP-4 inhibitor users. Similarly, a multicenter study by Baxter et al. [3], published in Thyroid, reported no elevated risk and additionally identified a possible protective trend among women. Brito et al. [4] analyzed United States electronic health records and demonstrated no significant difference in thyroid cancer risk between GLP-1RA and DPP-4 inhibitor users (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.36). Most recently, a large United States claims-based analysis by Morales et al. [5] supported these safety findings, although it noted a transient elevation in risk during the initial treatment year, which the investigators attributed to heightened medical surveillance rather than a true biological effect.
A critical additional consideration is the mechanistic basis underlying these epidemiological findings, which reveals marked species-specific differences in GLP-1 receptor biology and thyroid cellular responses. Preclinical data suggesting increased thyroid cancer risk stemmed primarily from rodent studies using high, non-physiological doses of GLP-1 analogs, wherein GLP-1RAs stimulated calcitonin gene expression, calcitonin release, and C-cell hyperplasia, resulting in an elevated risk of MTC [6,7]. However, human thyroid C-cell lesions exhibit much lower GLP-1 receptor expression than those of rodents, and primary cultures of human thyroid tissues show no functional response to GLP-1RA stimulation, indicating minimal functional GLP-1 receptor activity [8]. This mechanistic disparity provides a biological rationale for the discordance between preclinical safety signals and human epidemiological data. The species-specific differences in GLP-1 receptor expression and functional responsiveness underscore the importance of interpreting preclinical safety signals within the appropriate clinical context before extrapolating to human risk.
Moreover, increased clinical surveillance and diagnostic vigilance among patients receiving GLP-1RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors—prompted by early safety concerns—may have contributed to higher detection rates of asymptomatic or clinically insignificant thyroid nodules, potentially resulting in overdiagnosis. Recognizing and addressing this potential diagnostic bias is essential for accurate interpretation of epidemiological data and for minimizing unnecessary patient anxiety and unwarranted clinical interventions.
Collectively, these large-scale, population-based analyses from diverse geographic and ethnic backgrounds reinforce the conclusion that incretin-based therapies do not confer a clinically meaningful increase in thyroid cancer risk. Importantly, the methodological rigor of these studies, including propensity score matching, extensive control for confounding factors, and thorough sensitivity analyses, increases the reliability of their findings. Nonetheless, ongoing vigilance through longer-term follow-up studies remains crucial to confirm these safety profiles over extended treatment periods, especially given the potential for surveillance bias and overdiagnosis in the setting of intensified clinical monitoring [9].
Clinicians can find reassurance in the consistency of the emerging evidence supporting the thyroid cancer safety of incretin-based therapies. The convergence of data across multiple healthcare systems, study designs, and patient populations provides substantial confidence in these safety profiles. Nevertheless, individualized risk assessment remains warranted, especially for patients with specific risk factors such as familial thyroid cancer syndromes, a personal history of thyroid disease, or genetic predispositions to endocrine malignancies. Clinical decision-making should incorporate these patient-specific factors alongside the broader population-level safety evidence.
Finally, these findings highlight broader implications for drug development and regulatory oversight in the rapidly evolving field of diabetes therapeutics. As next-generation diabetes medications are developed, preclinical oncologic signals, especially those derived from rodent models, must be evaluated in light of human-specific biological plausibility and validated through high-quality, real-world evidence. The integration of long-term cancer surveillance, comprehensive post-marketing safety monitoring, and translational studies bridging laboratory findings with clinical outcomes will be essential to ensure the safe and responsible advancement of metabolic disease therapeutics.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Sun Wook Cho is a deputy editor of the journal. But she was not involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process of this article. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Table 1.
Comparative Summary of Major Population-Based Studies Evaluating Thyroid Cancer Risk with Incretin-Based Therapies
Study Population GLP-1RA users DPP-4i users Comparator HR (95% CI) Median follow-up, yr
Bea et al. (2024) [1] Korea (NHID) 21,722 904,300 SGLT2i GLP-1RA: 0.98 (0.62–1.53); DPP-4i: 0.95 (0.79–1.14) ~3.5
Pasternak et al. (2024) [2] Scandinavia, Taiwan, Korea 98,147 2,488,303 DPP-4i GLP-1RA: 0.81 (0.59–1.12) ~2–3
Baxter et al. (2025) [3] Multinational 48,325 210,250 DPP-4i GLP-1RA: 0.85 (0.63–1.17) ~3
Brito et al. (2025) [4] USA 28,717 120,907 DPP-4i GLP-1RA: 0.96 (0.67–1.36) ~2.4
Morales et al. (2025) [5] USA 460,032 2,055,583 SGLT2i GLP-1RA: 0.83 (0.57–1.27) ~2–3
DPP-4i GLP-1RA: 0.78 (0.60–1.01)

GLP-1RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NHID, National Health Insurance Database; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.

  • 1. Bea S, Son H, Bae JH, Cho SW, Shin JY, Cho YM, et al. Risk of thyroid cancer associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024;26:108–17.PubMed
  • 2. Pasternak B, Wintzell V, Hviid A, Eliasson B, Gudbjornsdottir S, Jonasson C, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist use and risk of thyroid cancer: scandinavian cohort study. BMJ 2024;385:e078225.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 3. Baxter SM, Lund LC, Andersen JH, Brix TH, Hegedus L, Hsieh MH, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and risk of thyroid cancer: an international multisite cohort study. Thyroid 2025;35:69–78.PubMed
  • 4. Brito JP, Herrin J, Swarna KS, Singh Ospina NM, Montori VM, Toro-Tobon D, et al. GLP-1RA use and thyroid cancer risk. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2025;151:243–52.PubMedPMC
  • 5. Morales DR, Bu F, Viernes B, DuVall SL, Matheny ME, Simon KR, et al. Risk of thyroid tumors with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 2025;48:1386–94.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 6. Bjerre Knudsen L, Madsen LW, Andersen S, Almholt K, de Boer AS, Drucker DJ, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists activate rodent thyroid C-cells causing calcitonin release and C-cell proliferation. Endocrinology 2010;151:1473–86.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 7. Bulchandani D, Nachnani JS, Herndon B, Molteni A, Pathan MH, Quinn T, et al. Effect of exendin (exenatide): GLP 1 receptor agonist on the thyroid and parathyroid gland in a rat model. Eur J Pharmacol 2012;691:292–6.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Boess F, Bertinetti-Lapatki C, Zoffmann S, George C, Pfister T, Roth A, et al. Effect of GLP1R agonists taspoglutide and liraglutide on primary thyroid C-cells from rodent and man. J Mol Endocrinol 2013;50:325–36.ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Welch HG, Kramer BS, Black WC. Epidemiologic signatures in cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1378–86.ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • PubReader PubReader
      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        Cite
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Thyroid Cancer Risk and the Next Generation of Diabetes Drugs: What Can We Learn from Incretin-Based Therapies?
        Endocrinol Metab. 2025;40(4):539-541.   Published online August 26, 2025
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Thyroid Cancer Risk and the Next Generation of Diabetes Drugs: What Can We Learn from Incretin-Based Therapies?
      Thyroid Cancer Risk and the Next Generation of Diabetes Drugs: What Can We Learn from Incretin-Based Therapies?
      Study Population GLP-1RA users DPP-4i users Comparator HR (95% CI) Median follow-up, yr
      Bea et al. (2024) [1] Korea (NHID) 21,722 904,300 SGLT2i GLP-1RA: 0.98 (0.62–1.53); DPP-4i: 0.95 (0.79–1.14) ~3.5
      Pasternak et al. (2024) [2] Scandinavia, Taiwan, Korea 98,147 2,488,303 DPP-4i GLP-1RA: 0.81 (0.59–1.12) ~2–3
      Baxter et al. (2025) [3] Multinational 48,325 210,250 DPP-4i GLP-1RA: 0.85 (0.63–1.17) ~3
      Brito et al. (2025) [4] USA 28,717 120,907 DPP-4i GLP-1RA: 0.96 (0.67–1.36) ~2.4
      Morales et al. (2025) [5] USA 460,032 2,055,583 SGLT2i GLP-1RA: 0.83 (0.57–1.27) ~2–3
      DPP-4i GLP-1RA: 0.78 (0.60–1.01)
      Table 1. Comparative Summary of Major Population-Based Studies Evaluating Thyroid Cancer Risk with Incretin-Based Therapies

      GLP-1RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NHID, National Health Insurance Database; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.


      Endocrinol Metab : Endocrinology and Metabolism
      TOP